Get to know your customer:
How to use big data to improve decisions, when it is the CMO who owns it, the
CIO who builds it and the innovator who disrupts it.
Hagen Wenzek, 2013-06-13
- Big
Data makes the customer transparent, but nobody really knows how to use that
knowledge
- The
CMO owns the relationship with the customer and wants to improve it using
technology
- The
CIO can make it happen by working with innovative startups
Big Data
promises to make the transparent consumer actionable with algorithms that can
analyze all personal, contextual and operational data available about them. In
the virtual world all of that data is collected by cookies, trackers and e.g. Facebook and one can easily be identified by an email address. That and credit
or loyalty card transactions link the virtual world seamlessly to the physical
world and via customer records to enterprise systems.

The
big promise of Big Data is to process all that consumer data and facilitate
better business decisions. In
marketing
and sales, that seems to be obvious, as such insight enables the right
message to be sent at the right time and cheaper than ever before.
However, there are also better decisions to be made in product development and innovation, when
instead of asking just a few focus groups what they want from a new product, one
can continuously observe all customers and learn from their behavior.
And even in many other functions of the enterprise like supply chain management where data about
the consumer originating in marketing has been notoriously suspicious for its
doubtful quality, in procurement, manufacturing, and logistics, better
decisions can be made based on really trustworthy consumer data. For example, a
global chemical supply company is looking to leverage marketing data about consumers
that is collected in the context of their clients, i.e. a consumer packaged
goods (CPG) company like P&G or Unilever. Armed with that insight they can optimize
their negotiations and supply chain as they sell ingredients for soap to that
very CPG company, because now they can forecast what their client might need based
on the marketing they do as well as what they see of the consumers’ responses.
Generally we can identify three big clusters of data:
- Transactional Data that gets collected
when the consumer navigates or does transactions on the web. Those are the
trackers and cookies that precisely identify a consumer as well as many more
metrics
- Operational Data that comes from enterprise
systems of records such as customer relationship management, sales, supply
chain management etc.
- Research Data that aggregates consumer
information and provides insights or presents audiences. Nielsen or Facebook
fall in that category – though one might argue Facebook is moving into the
first category
Today all of that data sits in individual siloes and is
managed separately – if it is being collected at all – , but its real value
comes from integration. Thus the question becomes obvious: who is responsible
for the data itself and who for its management?
Traditionally the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) and her/his
department own the relationship with the consumer. Their expertise lies in the reduction of complexity to the simplest possible message and finding creative ways to transport that message to the consumer. The better they do that, the higher the brand value. On the other hand, neither managing a
complex system that makes consumer data available is the core competency of a
marketer, nor is in most cases the very analytical thinking that leverages detailed information. The latter leads to potentially risky behavior when
oversimplification favors visualizing correlations over understanding
causations.

Here
is an example from a dashboard for a large consumer company where the media
buyers wanted to know when to buy more ads on Facebook or what other events are
related to certain spikes in reaching more friends. You can easily recognize
the danger in that type of visualization, as it makes it very easy to ‘see’ a correlation.
The dilemma is that dashboards that are any more complex are not being used at
all.
Where the CMO's team is strong in simplification and creativity,
it is the CIO who manages complexity and is process centric. Therefore, it
should naturally be the IT department that builds and maintains the Big Data
solution. However, to be successful, there are certain competencies that need
to be strengthened at IT. Three of those appear to be most critical:
1.
The relationship with the CMO
2.
Partnering with service providers for scale and
3.
Working with start-ups for innovation
(1) Forging the CMO – CIO Relationship
The first important aspect is forging a good relationship
with the CMO. Just like in large infrastructure projects, bridging a gap is
often more a political challenge than the actual engineering problem. CIOs have
over the past decade broadly succeeded in gaining trust by most functions in an
enterprise, such as sales, manufacturing, finance as well as the office of the
CEO. Therefore, they should be able to achieve the same with the CMO. There are
distinct aspects that stand out to be considered: Outcome, small steps and
storytelling.
- As
mentioned above, reducing complexity is marketing’s
core competency. Thus CIOs needs to avoid talking about how the system works, as that is
necessarily a very complex undertaking. The risk to be misunderstood and seen
as miscommunicating is high. What counts is explaining the outcome, talking
about the ‘What’, not the ‘How’. Succeeding with that communication style
immediately frees the IT team up to get the engineering work done.
- Small steps can already be big. What a
seasoned IT executive might think is just a small step, can already be a very
big one for somebody else. While having a vision and architecture for an
end-to-end automated infrastructure that provides detailed consumer data
synchronized with the supply chain management system to accelerate sales and
product innovation is absolutely doable these days, just indicating for what
product category advertisement dollars are being spent on a weekly basis can be
a great improvement. Therefore, don’t be too ambitious.
- Learn to tell stories. Great marketing
is all about telling stories, as people naturally understand and remember
stories. Therefore, wrapping the value proposition of a big data solution into
a story e.g. about how a client, competitor or already somebody within the
company used this newly found consumer insight and was successful with it can
be much more powerful than the usual formulation learned in engineering class or
even business school.
(2) Partner for Scalability
The second aspect of creating a big data platform is already
well known to an IT department: Picking a partner that provides robust
scalability for the main components of the infrastructure. By definition, big
data is BIG, therefore a trusted partner needs to be able to deliver at scale
and do so globally if your business has global exposure. All the major players
in IT are also offering strong big data solutions and choosing the right one is
no different than choosing the right partner for most other major IT enterprise
solutions. Those companies that lead also in cloud computing and have consumer
domain expertise occupy the sweet spot and are the best candidates for a
successful consumer transparency solution.
(3) Working with Start-ups
Lastly,
real differentiation against competition where practically everybody uses the
same data and large-scale infrastructure happens through distinct innovation.
The most disruptive innovation in the digital domains can be found at nimble
start-ups. However, finding and working with one poses a real challenge as
neither party is well equipped to do so. The methods to select an enterprise IT
partner like a Gartner ‘magic quadrant’ and other frameworks typically do not
exist for niche players or they do not apply. And some frameworks that are
available, such as the
LUMAscapes from
LUMA partners do offer a very
comprehensive overview of solutions and companies, but are hard to navigate
without help.
Let’s examine three less obvious aspects to this
challenge: Choosing the right perspective, making a decision and looking at the
right place.
- Through
creative eyes, start-ups can be seen as an outsourced R&D department: A
dedicated, highly ambitious team that comes up with an idea and has funding to
take an invention to the next level – just that the enterprise does not have to
hire and manage the people and their infrastructure nor cope with much of the
risk of an innovation portfolio. Thinking of a start-up as R&D provides a
perspective of openness and trust,
that is different than when viewing a traditional, established supplier.
- Actually
selecting a partner and leveraging an innovative solution in a critical
business infrastructure will drag on for far too long when the paradigm of
‘best of breed’ is overstretched. ‘Innovation’ and ‘disruption’ do not lend
themselves to the usual assessment of risk and leadership. Most of the time,
the difference between different solutions by similar start-ups is small, while
the gap to the existing capability is large. Thus, choosing one of the ‘good’
players in a certain domain and quickly deploying their solution will quite
certainly trump spending a lot of additional time trying to select ‘the best’.
- Just
like in the early 2000’s when practically every company went to China to search
for a manufacturing partner or to India for call centers, Silicon Valley is
praised as the silver bullet for technology innovation and for their start-ups.
However, the culture in that closed ecosystem is quite unique and might often
not be a good fit for an enterprise on the US East Coast, Europe or let alone
Asia. And if you follow the advice to view innovators like an outsourced
R&D function, cultural fit especially with their management team is
critical for success. So not to repeat the disappointment of those companies
that had to detract from China and India, one might rather take a close look at
the start-up scene in New York, Barcelona, Berlin or Tel Aviv.
Conclusion
Big Data holds a big promise when insight from any
consumer can be translated into superior business decisions. However, to make
that promise real requires flexibility and openness to new approaches,
especially by the CIO. Establishing a strong relationship with the CMO is
critical. Picking an enterprise IT partner for scale makes for solid business.
And using a niche innovator leads to competitive differentiation. If these
components are all brought together, the transparent consumer can be spotted
through technical lenses that make for better business decisions, and don’t
make you blind.